Filed: Aug. 31, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7397 BRANDON ROBERTS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. S.C. FARRIS; CALVIN SMITH; JOHN ROWLEY, Defendants – Appellees, and KEITH DURST; FRED NASTRI, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:09-cv-01385-AW) Submitted: August 25, 2011 Decided: August 31, 2011 Before DAVIS, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished pe
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7397 BRANDON ROBERTS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. S.C. FARRIS; CALVIN SMITH; JOHN ROWLEY, Defendants – Appellees, and KEITH DURST; FRED NASTRI, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:09-cv-01385-AW) Submitted: August 25, 2011 Decided: August 31, 2011 Before DAVIS, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7397
BRANDON ROBERTS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
S.C. FARRIS; CALVIN SMITH; JOHN ROWLEY,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
KEITH DURST; FRED NASTRI,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District
Judge. (8:09-cv-01385-AW)
Submitted: August 25, 2011 Decided: August 31, 2011
Before DAVIS, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brandon Roberts, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber,
Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Brandon Roberts, a state prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order granting Defendants’ motions to dismiss
and for summary judgment and denying Roberts’ motions to strike
and for partial summary judgment on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006)
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Roberts v. Farris, No. 8:09-cv-01385-AW (D. Md.
Sept. 16, 2010). We grant Roberts’ motion to file a memorandum
of law in lieu of an informal brief. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2