Filed: Sep. 01, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-6139 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. TIMOTHY JOHNSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior District Judge. (2:05-cr-00426-PMD-1) Submitted: June 29, 2011 Decided: September 1, 2011 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Timothy Johnson, A
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-6139 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. TIMOTHY JOHNSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior District Judge. (2:05-cr-00426-PMD-1) Submitted: June 29, 2011 Decided: September 1, 2011 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Timothy Johnson, Ap..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6139
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
TIMOTHY JOHNSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior
District Judge. (2:05-cr-00426-PMD-1)
Submitted: June 29, 2011 Decided: September 1, 2011
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Timothy Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Brent Alan Gray, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Timothy Johnson appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his motion seeking a reduction in his sentence
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly we affirm. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2