Filed: Sep. 01, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-6203 ROBERT GAMEZ SANCHEZ, Petitioner – Appellant, v. JOE COAKLEY, Warden; J. F. CARAWAY, Warden, Respondents – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:10-cv-01585-CCB) Submitted: June 9, 2011 Decided: September 1, 2011 Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Ga
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-6203 ROBERT GAMEZ SANCHEZ, Petitioner – Appellant, v. JOE COAKLEY, Warden; J. F. CARAWAY, Warden, Respondents – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:10-cv-01585-CCB) Submitted: June 9, 2011 Decided: September 1, 2011 Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Gam..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6203
ROBERT GAMEZ SANCHEZ,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
JOE COAKLEY, Warden; J. F. CARAWAY, Warden,
Respondents – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge.
(1:10-cv-01585-CCB)
Submitted: June 9, 2011 Decided: September 1, 2011
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Gamez Sanchez, Appellant Pro Se. Allen F. Loucks,
Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Robert Gamez Sanchez, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241
(West 2006 & Supp. 2010) petition. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Sanchez v. Coakley,
No. 1:10-cv-01585-CCB (D. Md. filed Jan. 28, 2011 & entered
Jan. 31, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2