Filed: Dec. 06, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-6887 THEOTIS MARQUETTE JOHNSON, a/k/a Prince Justice Foundation Allah, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. JOHN JABE, Deputy Director of Virginia Department of Corrections; LARRY HUFFMAN; KATHLEEN BASSETT; R. C. MATHENA; F. BAILEY; M. HATTFIELD, Sgt.; T. HIGGINS; D. VASS, Defendants – Appellees, and K. PRICE, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Di
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-6887 THEOTIS MARQUETTE JOHNSON, a/k/a Prince Justice Foundation Allah, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. JOHN JABE, Deputy Director of Virginia Department of Corrections; LARRY HUFFMAN; KATHLEEN BASSETT; R. C. MATHENA; F. BAILEY; M. HATTFIELD, Sgt.; T. HIGGINS; D. VASS, Defendants – Appellees, and K. PRICE, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Dis..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6887
THEOTIS MARQUETTE JOHNSON, a/k/a Prince Justice Foundation
Allah,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
JOHN JABE, Deputy Director of Virginia Department of
Corrections; LARRY HUFFMAN; KATHLEEN BASSETT; R. C.
MATHENA; F. BAILEY; M. HATTFIELD, Sgt.; T. HIGGINS; D.
VASS,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
K. PRICE,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District
Judge. (7:09-cv-00300-SGW)
Submitted: November 15, 2011 Decided: December 6, 2011
Before DUNCAN, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Theotis Marquette Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Mark R. Davis,
Assistant Attorney General, Lara Kate Jacobs, OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Theotis Johnson appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Johnson v. Jabe, No. 7:09-cv-00300-SGW (W.D. Va. June 22, 2011).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3