Filed: Dec. 16, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-1930 In re: TIAYON KARDELL EVANS, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (2:04-cr-00099-RAJ-1) Submitted: November 16, 2011 Decided: December 16, 2011 Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tiayon Kardell Evans, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Tiayon Kardell Evans petitions for a writ of man
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-1930 In re: TIAYON KARDELL EVANS, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (2:04-cr-00099-RAJ-1) Submitted: November 16, 2011 Decided: December 16, 2011 Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tiayon Kardell Evans, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Tiayon Kardell Evans petitions for a writ of mand..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1930
In re: TIAYON KARDELL EVANS,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (2:04-cr-00099-RAJ-1)
Submitted: November 16, 2011 Decided: December 16, 2011
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tiayon Kardell Evans, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Tiayon Kardell Evans petitions for a writ of mandamus
seeking an order compelling the district court to vacate his
criminal judgment on the ground that the district court lacked
jurisdiction to convict him. We conclude that Evans is not
entitled to mandamus relief.
Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used
only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. United States
Dist. Court,
426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United States v.
Moussaoui,
333 F.3d 509, 516-17 (4th Cir. 2003). Further,
mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a
clear right to the relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan
Ass'n,
860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Mandamus may not be
used as a substitute for appeal. In re Lockheed Martin Corp.,
503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007).
The relief sought by Evans is not available by way of
mandamus. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in
forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2