Filed: Dec. 30, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-1928 WILLIAM THOMAS DAVIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JOHN RICHARD YEAGER, JR., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:11-cv-00061-FPS-JES) Submitted: December 12, 2011 Decided: December 30, 2011 Before AGEE, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-1928 WILLIAM THOMAS DAVIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JOHN RICHARD YEAGER, JR., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:11-cv-00061-FPS-JES) Submitted: December 12, 2011 Decided: December 30, 2011 Before AGEE, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William ..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-1928 WILLIAM THOMAS DAVIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JOHN RICHARD YEAGER, JR., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:11-cv-00061-FPS-JES) Submitted: December 12, 2011 Decided: December 30, 2011 Before AGEE, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Thomas Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: William Thomas Davis appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Davis v. Yeager, No. 5:11-cv- 00061-FPS-JES (N.D. W. Va. Aug. 10, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
