Filed: Jan. 12, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-7302 WESLEY CARROLL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, U.S. Army Records Management and Declassification Agency, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (4:11-cv-00022-JLK) Submitted: January 4, 2012 Decided: January 12, 2012 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unp
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-7302 WESLEY CARROLL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, U.S. Army Records Management and Declassification Agency, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (4:11-cv-00022-JLK) Submitted: January 4, 2012 Decided: January 12, 2012 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpu..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-7302 WESLEY CARROLL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, U.S. Army Records Management and Declassification Agency, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (4:11-cv-00022-JLK) Submitted: January 4, 2012 Decided: January 12, 2012 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Wesley Carroll, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Wesley Carroll appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendant’s motion to dismiss his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Carroll v. Dep’t of the Army, No. 4:11-cv-00022-JLK (W.D. Va. Aug. 22, 2011). We deny Carroll’s pending motions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
