Filed: Jan. 18, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-6995 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. GREGORY W. BURWELL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:03-cr-00203-REP-1) Submitted: January 9, 2012 Decided: January 18, 2012 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gregory W. Burwell,
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-6995 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. GREGORY W. BURWELL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:03-cr-00203-REP-1) Submitted: January 9, 2012 Decided: January 18, 2012 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gregory W. Burwell, ..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-6995 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. GREGORY W. BURWELL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:03-cr-00203-REP-1) Submitted: January 9, 2012 Decided: January 18, 2012 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gregory W. Burwell, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Ronald Gill, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Gregory W. Burwell appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to correct a clerical error in the judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 36. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Burwell, No. 3:03-cr-00203-REP-1 (E.D. Va. July 8, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
