Filed: Feb. 08, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-1376 SUSAN F. KEEVER, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MARTHA MEDLOCK GALLAGHER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:10-cv-00237-FDW; 02-33036; 02-03243) Submitted: January 20, 2012 Decided: February 8, 2012 Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-1376 SUSAN F. KEEVER, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MARTHA MEDLOCK GALLAGHER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:10-cv-00237-FDW; 02-33036; 02-03243) Submitted: January 20, 2012 Decided: February 8, 2012 Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas B..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1376
SUSAN F. KEEVER,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MARTHA MEDLOCK GALLAGHER,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney,
District Judge. (3:10-cv-00237-FDW; 02-33036; 02-03243)
Submitted: January 20, 2012 Decided: February 8, 2012
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas B. Kakassy, THOMAS B. KAKASSY, PA, Gastonia, North
Carolina, for Appellant. Geoffrey A. Planer, GEOFFREY A. PLANER
LAW FIRM, Gastonia, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Martha Medlock Gallagher appeals from the district
court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order determining
that the debt arising from the underlying state court judgment
is non-dischargeable in its entirety under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6)
(2006). We have reviewed the record included on appeal, as well
as the parties’ briefs, and we find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the courts
below. Keever v. Gallagher, Nos. 3:10-cv-00237-FDW; 02-33036;
02-03243 (W.D.N.C. filed Mar. 25, 2011, and entered Mar. 28,
2011; May 1, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2