Filed: Feb. 13, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-1643 MICHAEL G.D. ROWE, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, NA; BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (4:10-cv-00092-RAJ-FBS) Submitted: February 9, 2012 Decided: February 13, 2012 Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam o
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-1643 MICHAEL G.D. ROWE, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, NA; BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (4:10-cv-00092-RAJ-FBS) Submitted: February 9, 2012 Decided: February 13, 2012 Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam op..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1643
MICHAEL G.D. ROWE,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
BANK OF AMERICA, NA; BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson,
District Judge. (4:10-cv-00092-RAJ-FBS)
Submitted: February 9, 2012 Decided: February 13, 2012
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Henry W. McLaughlin, III, LAW OFFICE OF HENRY MCLAUGHLIN, P.C.,
Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Robert M. Tata, Georgianna G.
Ramsey, HUNTON & WILLIAMS, LLP, Norfolk, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Michael G.D. Rowe appeals the district court’s order
granting Bank of America, N.A., and BAC Home Loans Servicing,
LP’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss his action,
brought pursuant to the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C.A.
§§ 1601-1667f (West 2009 & Supp. 2011). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. See Rowe v. Bank of
America, NA, No. 4:10-cv-00092-RAJ-FBS (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 11 &
entered Apr. 12, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2