Filed: Mar. 20, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-7620 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. TYRONE F. WEBB, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (3:93-cr-0007-CMC-1) Submitted: March 15, 2012 Decided: March 20, 2012 Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tyrone
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-7620 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. TYRONE F. WEBB, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (3:93-cr-0007-CMC-1) Submitted: March 15, 2012 Decided: March 20, 2012 Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tyrone ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7620
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
TYRONE F. WEBB,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (3:93-cr-0007-CMC-1)
Submitted: March 15, 2012 Decided: March 20, 2012
Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tyrone F. Webb, Appellant Pro Se. Stacey Denise Haynes,
Assistant United States Attorney, James Chris Leventis, Jr.,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Tyrone F. Webb appeals a district court order denying
his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)
(2006) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We affirm.
Because the amendment in question did not lower Webb’s
Guidelines sentence, we find the district did not abuse its
discretion denying the motion. United States v. Goines,
357
F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir. 2004) (stating standard of review).
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2