Filed: Mar. 29, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-1865 KARIN MARIE KENDRICK, Esq., Pro Se, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HON. COLLEEN A. CAVANAUGH, Baltimore County Orphan’s Court; HON. GRACE G. CONNOLLY, Register of Wills, Baltimore County; HON. JULIE L. ENSOR; HON. R. JAY FISHER, Sheriff, Baltimore County; OFFICERS JOHN AND JANE DOE, of the Baltimore County Sheriff’s Office; STATE OF MARYLAND, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Distr
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-1865 KARIN MARIE KENDRICK, Esq., Pro Se, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HON. COLLEEN A. CAVANAUGH, Baltimore County Orphan’s Court; HON. GRACE G. CONNOLLY, Register of Wills, Baltimore County; HON. JULIE L. ENSOR; HON. R. JAY FISHER, Sheriff, Baltimore County; OFFICERS JOHN AND JANE DOE, of the Baltimore County Sheriff’s Office; STATE OF MARYLAND, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Distri..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1865
KARIN MARIE KENDRICK, Esq., Pro Se,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HON. COLLEEN A. CAVANAUGH, Baltimore County Orphan’s Court;
HON. GRACE G. CONNOLLY, Register of Wills, Baltimore County;
HON. JULIE L. ENSOR; HON. R. JAY FISHER, Sheriff, Baltimore
County; OFFICERS JOHN AND JANE DOE, of the Baltimore County
Sheriff’s Office; STATE OF MARYLAND,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge.
(1:10-cv-02207-CCB)
Submitted: March 19, 2012 Decided: March 29, 2012
Before KING and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Karin Marie Kendrick, Appellant Pro Se. Hugh Scott Curtis,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Karin Marie Kendrick appeals the district court’s
order dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action as barred by
absolute judicial immunity, derivative judicial immunity, and
sovereign immunity. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Kendrick v. Cavanaugh, No. 1:10-cv-
02207-CCB (D. Md. July 14, 2011). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2