Filed: Apr. 02, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-2100 TORINA A. COLLIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:06-cv-01411-PJM) Submitted: March 29, 2012 Decided: April 2, 2012 Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Torina A. Collis, Appe
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-2100 TORINA A. COLLIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:06-cv-01411-PJM) Submitted: March 29, 2012 Decided: April 2, 2012 Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Torina A. Collis, Appel..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-2100
TORINA A. COLLIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District
Judge. (8:06-cv-01411-PJM)
Submitted: March 29, 2012 Decided: April 2, 2012
Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Torina A. Collis, Appellant Pro Se. Elena D. Marcuss,
MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Torina A. Collis appeals the district court’s
September 7, 2011, text order denying her motion for relief from
the district court’s July 20, 2010, final order. We have
reviewed the record and conclude that the district court did not
abuse its discretion in denying Collis’ Fed. R. Civ. P. R. 60(b)
motion. Eberhardt v. Integrated Design & Constr., Inc.,
167
F.3d 861, 869 (4th Cir. 1999) (stating standard of review). We
grant Collis’ motion to seal and dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2