Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Ronnie Ray Atkins v. David A. Williams, 93-6312 (1993)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 93-6312 Visitors: 28
Filed: Sep. 01, 1993
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 4 F.3d 984 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Ronnie Ray ATKINS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. David A. WILLIAMS, Respondent-Appellee. No. 93-6312. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: August 16, 1993. Decided: September 1, 1993. Appeal from the United States D
More

4 F.3d 984

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Ronnie Ray ATKINS, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
David A. WILLIAMS, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 93-6312.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: August 16, 1993.
Decided: September 1, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CA-92-337-R)

Ronnie Ray Atkins, Appellant Pro Se.

Hazel Elizabeth Shaffer, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

W.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before PHILLIPS, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1

Ronnie Ray Atkins seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Atkins v. Williams, No. CA-92-337-R (W.D. Va. Mar. 11, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer