Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Paul Higgins v. Robert L. Reese, Captain, 93-6231 (1993)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 93-6231 Visitors: 13
Filed: Sep. 08, 1993
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 4 F.3d 985 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Paul HIGGINS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert L. REESE, Captain, Respondent-Appellee. No. 93-6231. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: August 20, 1993. Decided: September 8, 1993. Appeal from the United States
More

4 F.3d 985

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Paul HIGGINS, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Robert L. REESE, Captain, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 93-6231.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: August 20, 1993.
Decided: September 8, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. (CA-92-30-3-MU)

Paul Higgins, Appellant Pro Se.

Richard Norwood League, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

W.D.N.C.

DISMISSED.

Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Paul Higgins seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Higgins v. Reese, No. CA-92-30-3-MU (W.D.N.C. Feb. 22, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer