Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

93-6451 (1993)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 93-6451 Visitors: 8
Filed: Oct. 22, 1993
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 8 F.3d 819 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Silas MOBLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Redd WILLIS; Robert M. Stewart; Dean Brown; Joe Watson; C. David Stone; Members of the Pickens County Council; South Carolina Law Enforcement Division, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-6451. United
More

8 F.3d 819

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Silas MOBLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Redd WILLIS; Robert M. Stewart; Dean Brown; Joe Watson;
C. David Stone; Members of the Pickens County
Council; South Carolina Law Enforcement
Division, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 93-6451.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: September 27, 1993.
Decided: October 22, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-93-509-8-6-BD)

Silas Mobley, Appellant Pro Se.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. We affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Mobley v. Willis, No. CA-93-5098-6-BD (D.S.C. Apr. 13, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer