Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Kermit T. Sigmon v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor Consolidation Coal Company, 92-2128 (1993)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 92-2128 Visitors: 12
Filed: Oct. 25, 1993
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 8 F.3d 820 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Kermit T. SIGMON, Petitioner, v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; Consolidation Coal Company, Respondents. No. 92-2128. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted:
More

8 F.3d 820

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Kermit T. SIGMON, Petitioner,
v.
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; Consolidation Coal
Company, Respondents.

No. 92-2128.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 28, 1993.
Decided: October 25, 1993.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (91-1196-BLA)

Kermit T. Sigmon, Petitioner Pro Se.

Helen Hart Cox, Barbara J. Johnson, United States Department of Labor, Washington, D.C.; Mary Rich Maloy, Jackson & Kelly, Charleston, West Virginia, for Respondents.

Ben.Rev.Bd.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1

Kermit T. Sigmon seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. # 8E8E # 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp. 1992). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Sigmon v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, No. 91-1196-BLA (B.R.B. July 29, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer