Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Boyette Andrew Williams v. P. L. Huffman Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Virginia, 93-6847 (1993)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 93-6847 Visitors: 12
Filed: Oct. 29, 1993
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 8 F.3d 823 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Boyette Andrew WILLIAMS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. P. L. HUFFMAN; Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Virginia, Respondents-Appellees. No. 93-6847. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: September 27, 1993. De
More

8 F.3d 823

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Boyette Andrew WILLIAMS, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
P. L. HUFFMAN; Attorney General of the Commonwealth of
Virginia, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 93-6847.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: September 27, 1993.
Decided: October 29, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke.

Boyette Andrew Williams, Appellant Pro Se.

W.D.Va.

DISMISSED

Before RUSSELL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Williams v. Huffman, No. CA-93-593-R (W.D. Va. Aug. 10, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer