Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Anthony Robert Wilson v. B. Brereton, Icc Chairman D. Mueller, Chairman Captain Day, Investigator Kim Taliaferro, Secretary, 93-6740 (1993)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 93-6740 Visitors: 17
Filed: Oct. 28, 1993
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 8 F.3d 823 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Anthony Robert WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. B. BRERETON, ICC Chairman; D. Mueller, Chairman; Captain Day, Investigator; Kim Taliaferro, Secretary, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-6740. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
More

8 F.3d 823

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Anthony Robert WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
B. BRERETON, ICC Chairman; D. Mueller, Chairman; Captain
Day, Investigator; Kim Taliaferro, Secretary,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 93-6740.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: September 27, 1993.
Decided: October 28, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond.

Anthony Robert Wilson, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before RUSSELL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. The district court assessed a filing fee in accordance with Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and dismissed the case without prejudice when Appellant failed to comply with the fee order. Finding no abuse of discretion, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer