Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Ramon Jesus Dorado v. Jon P. Galley Attorney General of the State of Maryland, 93-6566 (1993)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 93-6566 Visitors: 38
Filed: Dec. 02, 1993
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 12 F.3d 204 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Ramon Jesus DORADO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jon P. GALLEY; Attorney General of the State of Maryland, Respondents-Appellees. No. 93-6566. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: November 16, 1993 Decided: Decemb
More

12 F.3d 204

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Ramon Jesus DORADO, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Jon P. GALLEY; Attorney General of the State of Maryland,
Respondents-Appellees.

No. 93-6566.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 16, 1993
Decided: December 2, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.

Ramon Jesus Dorado, Appellant Pro Se.

John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Mary Ann Rapp Ince, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, for Appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1

Ramon Jesus Dorado appeals from the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Dorado v. Galley, No. CA-92-3569-HAR (D. Md. Apr. 6, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer