Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Freddie Robinson v. State of North Carolina, 93-6989 (1993)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 93-6989 Visitors: 5
Filed: Nov. 18, 1993
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 12 F.3d 205 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Freddie ROBINSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-6989. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 25, 1993. Decided Nov. 18, 1993. Appeal from the United States Distr
More

12 F.3d 205

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Freddie ROBINSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 93-6989.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 25, 1993.
Decided Nov. 18, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh, No. MISC-93-32-F; James C. Fox, Chief District Judge.

Freddie Robinson, pro se.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying his Motion for Release Pending Appeal pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. Sec. 3143(b) (West Supp.1993), and his Petition for Release Under 28 U.S.C.A. Sec. 1446 (West Supp.1993). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Robinson v. North Carolina, No. MISC-93-32-F (E.D.N.C. Aug. 2, 1993 & Oct. 13, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer