Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Robert L. Mills v. Eastern Associated Coal Corporation Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, 92-1333 (1993)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 92-1333 Visitors: 23
Filed: Nov. 30, 1993
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 12 F.3d 205 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Robert L. MILLS, Petitioner, v. EASTERN ASSOCIATED COAL CORPORATION; Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, Respondents. No. 92-1333. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. N
More

12 F.3d 205

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Robert L. MILLS, Petitioner,
v.
EASTERN ASSOCIATED COAL CORPORATION; Director, Office of
Workers' Compensation Programs, United States
Department of Labor, Respondents.

No. 92-1333.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Nov. 30, 1993.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.

Robert L. Mills, Petitioner Pro Se.

Mark Elliott Solomons, Laura Metcoff Klaus; Rita A. Roppolo and Barbara J. Johnson, for Respondents.

Ben.Rev.Bd.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1

Robert L. Mills seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. # 8E8E # 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp.1992). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Mills v. Eastern Associated Coal Corp., No. 90-1934-BLA (B.R.B. Feb. 25, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer