Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Ronald A. Wilson v. Richard A. Lanham Sewall Smith, Warden, 93-7007 (1993)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 93-7007 Visitors: 33
Filed: Nov. 18, 1993
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 12 F.3d 206 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Ronald A. WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard A. LANHAM; Sewall Smith, Warden, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-7007. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 25, 1993. Decided Nov. 18, 1993. Appeal from the U
More

12 F.3d 206

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Ronald A. WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Richard A. LANHAM; Sewall Smith, Warden, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 93-7007.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 25, 1993.

Decided Nov. 18, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore, No. CA-93-2540-L; Benson E. Legg, District Judge.

Ronald A. Wilson, pro se.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wilson v. Lanham, No. CA-93-2540-L (D.Md. Sept. 7, 1993).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

*

We deny Wilson's motion for appointment of counsel. See Whisenant v. Yuam, 739 F.2d 160 (4th Cir.1984)

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer