Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Robert Leon White v. Brunswick Correctional Center Medical Department Dr. Thomas M. Stevens Harris Nurse Elder Nurse Lafoon, 93-7211 (1994)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 93-7211 Visitors: 9
Filed: Mar. 08, 1994
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 19 F.3d 13 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Robert Leon WHITE, Plaintiff Appellant, v. BRUNSWICK CORRECTIONAL CENTER MEDICAL DEPARTMENT; Dr. Thomas; M. Stevens Harris; Nurse Elder; Nurse Lafoon, Defendants Appellees. No. 93-7211. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
More

19 F.3d 13

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Robert Leon WHITE, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
BRUNSWICK CORRECTIONAL CENTER MEDICAL DEPARTMENT; Dr.
Thomas; M. Stevens Harris; Nurse Elder; Nurse
Lafoon, Defendants Appellees.

No. 93-7211.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 17, 1994.
Decided: March 8, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CA-93-584-AM).

Robert Leon White, appellant pro se.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. The district court assessed a filing fee in accordance with Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and dismissed the case without prejudice when Appellant failed to comply with the fee order. Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer