Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Henry L. King v. Bishop Robinson, Secretary, Correctional Services Somerset County Sheriff's Department, 94-6075 (1994)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 94-6075 Visitors: 23
Filed: Mar. 18, 1994
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 19 F.3d 1429 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Henry L. KING, Plaintiff Appellant, v. Bishop ROBINSON, Secretary, Correctional Services; Somerset County Sheriff's Department, Defendants Appellees. No. 94-6075. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 17,
More

19 F.3d 1429

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Henry L. KING, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Bishop ROBINSON, Secretary, Correctional Services; Somerset
County Sheriff's Department, Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-6075.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 17, 1994.
Decided March 18, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge.

Henry L. King, appellant Pro Se.

John Joseph Curran, Jr., Atty. Gene., Richard Bruce Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., Baltimore, MD, for appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. King v. Robinson, No. CA-93-244-S (D. Md. Dec. 3, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer