Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Walter R. Thompson, Jr. v. C. Holly, Employee Correctional Medical System J. Webster, Director, Employer, 93-7059 (1994)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 93-7059 Visitors: 19
Filed: Mar. 31, 1994
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 19 F.3d 1430 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Walter R. THOMPSON, Jr., Plaintiff Appellant, v. C. HOLLY, Employee; Correctional Medical System; J. Webster, Director, Employer, Defendants Appellees. No. 93-7059. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted March 1
More

19 F.3d 1430

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Walter R. THOMPSON, Jr., Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
C. HOLLY, Employee; Correctional Medical System; J.
Webster, Director, Employer, Defendants Appellees.

No. 93-7059.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 17, 1994.
Decided March 31, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.

Walter R. Thompson, Jr., appellant pro se.

Jeff Wayne Rose, Adler, Rosen & Peters, P.C., Virginia Beach, VA, for appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Thompson v. Holly, No. CA-92-1209-2 (E.D. Va. Sept. 16, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer