Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Jesse James Pritchard, Jr. v. C. Thompson T. Bullock L. W. Jackson, 93-7331 (1994)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 93-7331 Visitors: 10
Filed: Apr. 12, 1994
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 21 F.3d 423 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Jesse James PRITCHARD, Jr., Plaintiff Appellant, v. C. THOMPSON; T. Bullock; L. W. Jackson, Defendants Appellees. No. 93-7331. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: April 5, 1994. Decided: April 12, 1994. Appea
More

21 F.3d 423
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Jesse James PRITCHARD, Jr., Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
C. THOMPSON; T. Bullock; L. W. Jackson, Defendants Appellees.

No. 93-7331.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 5, 1994.
Decided: April 12, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CA-93-350)

Jesse James Pritchard, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. The district court assessed a filing fee in accordance with Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and dismissed the case without prejudice when Appellant failed to comply with the fee order. Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm the district court's order. We also deny Pritchard's motion for injunction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer