Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Alfred Avins v. City of Alexandria, 94-1337 (1994)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 94-1337 Visitors: 21
Filed: May 17, 1994
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 23 F.3d 399 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Alfred AVINS, Plaintiff Appellant, v. CITY OF ALEXANDRIA, Defendant Appellee. No. 94-1337. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit Submitted April 21, 1994. Decided May 17, 1994. Appeal from the United States District Court
More

23 F.3d 399
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Alfred AVINS, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
CITY OF ALEXANDRIA, Defendant Appellee.

No. 94-1337.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Submitted April 21, 1994.
Decided May 17, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-93-1389-A)

Alfred Avins, appellant pro se.

Ignacio Britto Pessoa, City Attorney's Office, Alexandria, VA, for appellee.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment for the Defendant in this action challenging the denial on several grounds of a special use permit. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Avins v. City of Alexandria, No. CA-93-1389-A (E.D. Va. Feb. 14, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer