Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Johnney Joseph Hartney v. Armed Forces Radio Rush Limbaugh Radio & Television Joseph Cook, Colonel, 94-1226 (1994)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 94-1226 Visitors: 10
Filed: May 17, 1994
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 23 F.3d 401 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Johnney Joseph HARTNEY, Plaintiff Appellant, v. ARMED FORCES RADIO; Rush Limbaugh Radio & Television; Joseph Cook, Colonel, Defendants Appellees. No. 94-1226. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit Submitted: April 21, 1994
More

23 F.3d 401
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Johnney Joseph HARTNEY, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
ARMED FORCES RADIO; Rush Limbaugh Radio & Television;
Joseph Cook, Colonel, Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-1226.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Submitted: April 21, 1994.
Decided: May 17, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-93-1651-A)

Johnney Joseph Hartney, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Johnney Joseph Hartney appeals the district court's order dismissing his complaint as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915(d) (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hartney v. Armed Forces Radio, No. CA-93-1651-A (E.D. Va. Dec. 30, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer