Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Joseph Marion Head, Jr. v. North Carolina Prisoner Legal Services, Incorporated, 94-6227 (1994)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 94-6227 Visitors: 3
Filed: May 20, 1994
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 23 F.3d 401 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Joseph Marion HEAD, Jr., Plaintiff Appellant, v. North Carolina Prisoner Legal Services, Incorporated, Defendant Appellee. No. 94-6227. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. No. 94-6227. Submitted: April 21, 1994. Decided
More

23 F.3d 401
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Joseph Marion HEAD, Jr., Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
North Carolina Prisoner Legal Services, Incorporated,
Defendant Appellee.

No. 94-6227.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

No. 94-6227.
Submitted: April 21, 1994.
Decided: May 20, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-94-66-5-BR).

Joseph Marion Head, appellant Pro Se.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Head v. North Carolina Prisoner Legal Servs., No. CA-94-66-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Feb. 23, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer