Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

93-2062 (1994)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 93-2062 Visitors: 1
Filed: May 16, 1994
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 23 F.3d 402 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Deborah Deane RADFORD, Administratrix of the Estate of Jeffrey Dallas Radford, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. R. Richael MANGUM, Raleigh County Sheriff; J. R. Lilly, Chief Corrections Officer; Other unnamed sheriff deputies & ag
More

23 F.3d 402
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Deborah Deane RADFORD, Administratrix of the Estate of
Jeffrey Dallas Radford, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
R. Richael MANGUM, Raleigh County Sheriff; J. R. Lilly,
Chief Corrections Officer; Other unnamed sheriff deputies &
agents of the Raleigh County, West Virginia Sheriff's
Department; County Commission of Raleigh County, West
Virginia, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 93-2062.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Argued: April 11, 1994.
Decided: May 16, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Elizabeth V. Hallanan, District Judge. (CA-91-828)

James E. Uschold, Hackett & Dunne, New Orleans, Louisiana, for Appellant.

Steven Paul McGowan, Steptoe & Johnson, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Robert L. Hackett, Hackett & Dunne, New Orleans, Louisiana, for Appellant.

John C. Stump, Steptoe & Johnson, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.

S.D.W.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and TURK, United States District Judge for the Western District of Virginia, sitting by designation.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

We have reviewed the arguments raised by appellant in this case and have determined that they are without merit. We affirm on the thorough and well-reasoned opinion of the district court, Radford v. Mangum, No. 5:91-0828 (S.D. W. Va. July 21, 1993).

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer