Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Nicholas Warner Jones, A/K/A Charles Jones v. Vivian Willis, Officer, Co III Earl O. Spain, Captain, Co v. J. Keubler, Officer, Co I, 93-7182 (1994)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 93-7182 Visitors: 29
Filed: Aug. 02, 1994
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 30 F.3d 129 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Nicholas Warner JONES, a/k/a Charles Jones, Plaintiff Appellant, v. Vivian WILLIS, Officer, CO III; Earl O. Spain, Captain, CO V; J. Keubler, Officer, CO I, Defendants Appellees. No. 93-7182. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth
More

30 F.3d 129

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Nicholas Warner JONES, a/k/a Charles Jones, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Vivian WILLIS, Officer, CO III; Earl O. Spain, Captain, CO
V; J. Keubler, Officer, CO I, Defendants Appellees.

No. 93-7182.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 19, 1994.
Decided: August 2, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-92-2581-L)

Nicholas Warner Jones, Appellant Pro Se.

Glenn William Bell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Jones v. Willis, No. CA-92-2581-L (D. Md. Oct. 15, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer