Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Claiborne Roberts, Sr. v. James Rollins, Warden L. Luckett, Officer C.O.I. G. Artes, Officer c.o.ii Bernard Smith, Warden, and Betty B. Christmas, 93-6012 (1994)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 93-6012 Visitors: 10
Filed: Aug. 03, 1994
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 30 F.3d 130 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Claiborne ROBERTS, SR., Plaintiff Appellant, v. James ROLLINS, Warden; L. Luckett, Officer C.O.I.; G. Artes, Officer C.O.II; Bernard Smith, Warden, Defendants Appellees, and Betty B. CHRISTMAS, Defendant. No. 93-6012. United States
More

30 F.3d 130

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Claiborne ROBERTS, SR., Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
James ROLLINS, Warden; L. Luckett, Officer C.O.I.; G.
Artes, Officer C.O.II; Bernard Smith, Warden,
Defendants Appellees,
and Betty B. CHRISTMAS, Defendant.

No. 93-6012.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 26, 1994.
Decided Aug. 3, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Edward S. Northrop, Senior District Judge. (CA-91-1317-N)

Claiborne Roberts, Sr., appellant Pro Se.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, Circuit Judge, BUTZNER and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Roberts v. Rollins, No. CA-91-1317-N (D. Md. Dec. 1, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer