Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Juan Pardo v. Carolyn v. Rickards Captain Kepley Lieutenant Irrizary, 94-6588 (1994)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 94-6588 Visitors: 5
Filed: Aug. 02, 1994
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 30 F.3d 130 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Juan PARDO, Plaintiff Appellant, v. Carolyn V. RICKARDS; Captain Kepley; Lieutenant Irrizary, Defendants Appellees. No. 94-6588. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: June 23, 1994 Decided: August 2, 1994. Appe
More

30 F.3d 130

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Juan PARDO, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Carolyn V. RICKARDS; Captain Kepley; Lieutenant Irrizary,
Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-6588.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 23, 1994
Decided: August 2, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-94-130-2)

Juan Pardo, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Pardo v. Rickards, No. CA 94-130-2 (E.D. Va. May 3, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer