Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Kevin Ronald Adams, 93-6685 (1994)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 93-6685 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jul. 14, 1994
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 30 F.3d 131 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee, v. Kevin Ronald ADAMS, Defendant Appellant. No. 93-6685. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: June 23, 1994. Decided: July 14, 1994. Appeal from the United States
More

30 F.3d 131

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,
v.
Kevin Ronald ADAMS, Defendant Appellant.

No. 93-6685.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 23, 1994.
Decided: July 14, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CR-89-434-S, CA-93-1723-S)

Kevin Ronald Adams, Appellant Pro Se.

Harvey Ellis Eisenberg, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, although we grant Adams in forma pauperis status, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Adams, Nos. CR-89-434-S; CA-93-1723-S (D. Md. June 14, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer