Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Anthony Tabb v. Earl B. Beshears Attorney General of the State of Maryland, 94-6414 (1994)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 94-6414 Visitors: 18
Filed: Jul. 25, 1994
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 30 F.3d 131 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Anthony TABB, Petitioner Appellant, v. Earl B. BESHEARS; Attorney General of The State of Maryland, Respondents Appellees. No. 94-6414. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: July 12, 1994 Decided: July 25, 1994
More

30 F.3d 131

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Anthony TABB, Petitioner Appellant,
v.
Earl B. BESHEARS; Attorney General of The State of
Maryland, Respondents Appellees.

No. 94-6414.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 12, 1994
Decided: July 25, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey, II, Senior District Judge. (CA-93-3741)

Anthony Tabb, Appellant Pro Se.

John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Mary Jennifer Landis, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, PHILLIPS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion for reconsideration of the denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Tabb v. Beshears, No. CA-93-3741 (D. Md. Mar. 10, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer