Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

James William Wright v. Edward W. Murray, 94-6539 (1994)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 94-6539 Visitors: 16
Filed: Jul. 27, 1994
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 30 F.3d 132 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. James William WRIGHT, Petitioner Appellant, v. Edward W. MURRAY, Respondent Appellee. No. 94-6539. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted June 23, 1994. Decided July 27, 1994. Appeal from the United States Distri
More

30 F.3d 132

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
James William WRIGHT, Petitioner Appellant,
v.
Edward W. MURRAY, Respondent Appellee.

No. 94-6539.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 23, 1994.
Decided July 27, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CA-93-1474-AM).

James William Wright, appellant Pro Se.

Thomas Drummond Bagwell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Richmond, VA, for appellee.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Wright v. Murray, No. CA-93-1474-AM (E.D. Va. Apr. 14, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer