Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Dennis Ray Graves v. Lonnie Saunders Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Virginia, 94-6342 (1994)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 94-6342 Visitors: 13
Filed: Aug. 08, 1994
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 32 F.3d 562 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Dennis Ray GRAVES, Petitioner Appellant, v. Lonnie SAUNDERS; Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Virginia, Respondents Appellees. No. 94-6342. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted July 19, 1994. Decided Aug
More

32 F.3d 562

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Dennis Ray GRAVES, Petitioner Appellant,
v.
Lonnie SAUNDERS; Attorney General of the Commonwealth of
Virginia, Respondents Appellees.

No. 94-6342.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 19, 1994.
Decided Aug. 8, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-93-693).

Dennis Ray Graves, Appellant Pro Se.

Susan Campbell Alexander, Asst. Atty. Gen., Richmond, VA, for appellees.

W.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before HALL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Graves v. Saunders, No. Ca-93-693 (W.D.Va. Mar. 15, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.*

2

DISMISSED.

*

We also deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer