Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Gregory Rudolph Davis, 94-6349 (1994)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 94-6349 Visitors: 16
Filed: Aug. 08, 1994
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 32 F.3d 563 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee, v. Gregory Rudolph DAVIS, Defendant Appellant. No. 94-6349. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted July 19, 1994. Decided Aug. 8, 1994. Appeal from the United States
More

32 F.3d 563

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,
v.
Gregory Rudolph DAVIS, Defendant Appellant.

No. 94-6349.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 19, 1994.
Decided Aug. 8, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CR-89-285, CA-93-1260-6-9AK).

Gregory Rudolph Davis, appellant Pro Se.

William Corley Lucius, Asst. U.S. Atty., Greenville, SC, for appellee.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Davis, Nos. CR-89-285; CA-93-1260-6-9AK (D.S.C. Mar. 10, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer