Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Sylvester M. Parham, 94-6593 (1994)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 94-6593 Visitors: 11
Filed: Jul. 28, 1994
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 32 F.3d 563 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee, v. Sylvester M. PARHAM, Defendant Appellant. No. 94-6593. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. No. 94-6593. Submitted: June 23, 1994. Decided: July 28, 1994. Appeal from the
More

32 F.3d 563

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,
v.
Sylvester M. PARHAM, Defendant Appellant.

No. 94-6593.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

No. 94-6593.

Submitted: June 23, 1994.
Decided: July 28, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CR-90-120, CA-94-338)

Sylvester M. Parham, Appellant Pro Se.

Stephen Wiley Miller, Office of the United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Parham, Nos. CR-90-120; CA-94-338 (E.D. Va. May 20, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer