Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Drayton M. Smith v. Parker Evatt, Commissioner, South Carolina Department of Corrections T. Travis Medlock, Attorney General of South Carolina, 94-6302 (1994)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 94-6302 Visitors: 11
Filed: Aug. 08, 1994
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 32 F.3d 563 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Drayton M. SMITH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Parker EVATT, Commissioner, South Carolina Department of Corrections; T. Travis Medlock, Attorney General of South Carolina, Respondents-Appellees. No. 94-6302. United States Court of Appe
More

32 F.3d 563

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Drayton M. SMITH, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Parker EVATT, Commissioner, South Carolina Department of
Corrections; T. Travis Medlock, Attorney General
of South Carolina, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 94-6302.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 19, 1994
Decided Aug. 8, 1994.

Before HALL, LUTTIG and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Drayton M. Smith, Appellant Pro Se.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Smith v. Evatt, No. CA-94-396-3-6BD (D.S.C. Feb. 28, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer