Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Charles W. Johnson v. Glenn F. MacHer Martinsburg City Police City of Martinsburg, 94-1385 (1994)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 94-1385 Visitors: 14
Filed: Aug. 04, 1994
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 34 F.3d 1066 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Charles W. JOHNSON, Plaintiff Appellant, v. Glenn F. MACHER, Martinsburg City Police; City of Martinsburg, Defendants Appellees. No. 94-1385. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: July 19, 1994. Decided: Augus
More

34 F.3d 1066

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Charles W. JOHNSON, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Glenn F. MACHER, Martinsburg City Police; City of
Martinsburg, Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-1385.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 19, 1994.
Decided: August 4, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. William M. Kidd, Senior District Judge. (CA-91-40-M(K))

Charles W. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.

Michael Douglas Lorensen, Bowles, Rice, McDavid, Graff & Love, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellees.

N.D.W.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. Macher, No. CA-91-40-M(K) (N.D.W. Va. Feb. 28, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer