Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Lester Leroy Hummer, 94-6305 (1994)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 94-6305 Visitors: 17
Filed: Aug. 12, 1994
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 34 F.3d 1067 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee, v. Lester Leroy HUMMER, Defendant Appellant. No. 94-6305. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Aug. 12, 1994. Submitted: May 31, 1994 Decided: August 12, 1994. Appeal from t
More

34 F.3d 1067

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,
v.
Lester Leroy HUMMER, Defendant Appellant.

No. 94-6305.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Aug. 12, 1994.
Submitted: May 31, 1994
Decided: August 12, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Chief District Judge. (CR-89-170-A, CA-93-428-A)

Lester Leroy Hummer, Appellant Pro Se.

Lawrence Joseph Leiser, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, VA, for Appellee.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Hummer, Nos. CR-89-170-A; CA-93-428-A (E.D. Va. Feb. 18, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer