Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Lloyd Hampton Christian v. Edward W. Murray, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, 94-6239 (1994)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 94-6239 Visitors: 14
Filed: Sep. 27, 1994
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 36 F.3d 1091 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Lloyd Hampton CHRISTIAN, Petitioner Appellant, v. Edward W. MURRAY, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent Appellee. No. 94-6239. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 25, 1994. Dec
More

36 F.3d 1091

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Lloyd Hampton CHRISTIAN, Petitioner Appellant,
v.
Edward W. MURRAY, Director of the Virginia Department of
Corrections, Respondent Appellee.

No. 94-6239.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 25, 1994.
Decided Sept. 27, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, District Judge. (CA-93-690-2)

Lloyd Hampton Christian, appellant pro se.

Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Richmond, VA, for appellee.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before RUSSELL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Christian v. Murray, No. CA-93-690-2 (E.D. Va. Feb. 28, 1994). We deny Appellant's motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer