Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Freddy Sylvestor Campbell v. West Virginia Department of Corrections Nicholas J. Hun, Commissioner Transor America, Incorporated Two Unknown Drivers, 94-6553 (1994)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 94-6553 Visitors: 21
Filed: Oct. 05, 1994
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 36 F.3d 1091 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Freddy Sylvestor CAMPBELL, Plaintiff Appellant, v. WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; Nicholas J. Hun, Commissioner; Transor America, Incorporated; Two Unknown Drivers, Defendants Appellees. No. 94-6553. United States Court
More

36 F.3d 1091

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Freddy Sylvestor CAMPBELL, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; Nicholas J. Hun,
Commissioner; Transor America, Incorporated; Two
Unknown Drivers, Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-6553.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 25, 1994.
Decided Oct. 5, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, Chief District Judge. (CA-94-241-2).

Freddy Sylvestor Campbell, appellant Pro Se.

S.D.W.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief without prejudice on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Campbell v. West Virginia Dep't of Corrections, No. CA-94-241-2 (S.D.W. Va. Apr. 21, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer