Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Dontay Carter v. James v. Peguese, Captain Thomas Stewart Ken Fenton, Officer H. Grant, Lieutenant, 94-6360 (1994)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 94-6360 Visitors: 24
Filed: Sep. 27, 1994
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 36 F.3d 1091 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Dontay CARTER, Plaintiff Appellant, v. James V. PEGUESE, Captain; Thomas Stewart; Ken Fenton, Officer; H. Grant, Lieutenant, Defendants Appellees. No. 94-6360. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 25, 199
More

36 F.3d 1091

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Dontay CARTER, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
James V. PEGUESE, Captain; Thomas Stewart; Ken Fenton,
Officer; H. Grant, Lieutenant, Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-6360.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 25, 1994.
Decided Sept. 27, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-93-1024-WN)

Dontay Carter, appellant pro se.

John Joseph Curran, Jr., Atty. Gen., Audrey J.S. Carrion, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, for appellees.

Before RUSSELL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Carter v. Peguese, No. CA-93-1024-WN (D. Md. Mar. 14, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer