Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Vincent Tidwell v. L. Burrows, Correctional Officer Gerald L. Bass, Deputy Warden, Greensville Correctional Center, 94-7160 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 94-7160 Visitors: 53
Filed: Feb. 14, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 47 F.3d 1165 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Vincent TIDWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. L. BURROWS, Correctional Officer; Gerald L. Bass, Deputy Warden, Greensville Correctional Center, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-7160. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitte
More

47 F.3d 1165

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Vincent TIDWELL, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
L. BURROWS, Correctional Officer; Gerald L. Bass, Deputy
Warden, Greensville Correctional Center,
Defendants--Appellees.

No. 94-7160.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 13, 1994.
Decided Feb. 14, 1995.

Vincent Tidwell, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA, for Appellees.

Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Tidwell v. Burrows, No. CA-94-343-3 (E.D. Va. Oct. 3, 1994). We also deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel. See Whisenant v. Yuam, 739 F.2d 160 (4th Cir.1984). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer