Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Arturo Francisco Brown, A/K/A Montana, 94-6530 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 94-6530 Visitors: 19
Filed: Feb. 14, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 47 F.3d 1166 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arturo Francisco BROWN, a/k/a Montana, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-6530. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 19, 1995. Decided Feb. 14, 1995. Arturo Franc
More

47 F.3d 1166

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee,
v.
Arturo Francisco BROWN, a/k/a Montana, Defendant--Appellant.

No. 94-6530.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 19, 1995.
Decided Feb. 14, 1995.

Arturo Francisco Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Francis Joseph, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, NC, for Appellee.

Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Brown, No. CR-90-196; CA-93-466 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 14, 1994).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

We grant Appellant's motion to file a supplemental appendix and his motion to file an informal brief out of time

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer