Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Stewart William Baylor, Jr. v. E. C. Morris Valerie D. Rasheed, Regional Ombudsman David L. Smith Richard A. Young, 94-6981 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 94-6981 Visitors: 12
Filed: Mar. 07, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 48 F.3d 1215 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Stewart William BAYLOR, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. E. C. MORRIS; Valerie D. Rasheed, Regional Ombudsman; David L. Smith; Richard A. Young, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-6981. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submit
More

48 F.3d 1215
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Stewart William BAYLOR, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
E. C. MORRIS; Valerie D. Rasheed, Regional Ombudsman;
David L. Smith; Richard A. Young, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-6981.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 16, 1995.
Decided March 7, 1995.

Steward William Baylor, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA, for Appellees.

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. Our review of the record and the district court's opinions discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Baylor v. Morris, No. CA-93-550-R (W.D.Va. Feb. 14, 1994; July 12, 1994; and Aug. 3, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer