Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Roger Lee Coffey v. Lonnie Saunders Jack Lee Sandra Murphy Sergeant Deola Officer McCallister, 94-7200 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 94-7200 Visitors: 23
Filed: Mar. 14, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 48 F.3d 1215 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Roger Lee COFFEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lonnie SAUNDERS; Jack Lee; Sandra Murphy; Sergeant Deola; Officer Mccallister, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-7200. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: Feb. 16, 1995 D
More

48 F.3d 1215
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Roger Lee COFFEY, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Lonnie SAUNDERS; Jack Lee; Sandra Murphy; Sergeant Deola;
Officer Mccallister, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 94-7200.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 16, 1995
Decided: March 14, 1995

Roger Lee Coffey, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Campbell Alexander, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Va; Colin James Steuart Thomas, III, Timberlake, Smith, Thomas & Moses, P.C., Staunton, VA, for Appellees.

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Coffey v. Saunders, No. CA-94-246-R (W.D.Va. Oct. 12, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer